Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime others however argue that the circumstances of and individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken in to account when deciding on punishment. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
Sample Answer: 1
In most of the countries around the world, there are punishments fixed for each kind of crime. However there is a notion among people that the situation, circumstances and motivation should also be taken into consideration while punishing the victims. There are different views of different people but I fall in the category who believe there should be fixed punishment for each crime.
To begin with, equality is the most crucial factor which judiciary of every democracy follows. We live in a modern world where every person has equal rights and the law is same for everyone. All the democracies follow their constitution which is same for every citizen. Treating the same crime with different punishment is a hypocrisy and disrespect to the judiciary and constitution. It even develops insecurity among the citizens and also a feeling of inequality.
In addition, there are several reasons such as the motivation and circumstances can be manipulated to misguide the judiciary. It will be difficult for the judiciary to keep the record for each type of circumstance and further more it will be more like a monarchy or dictatorship if such laws are executed. Criminals might use these flaws in the laws to misguide the court through expressing a wrong situation. Furthermore, it will difficult for the court or the judiciary system to give new punishments based on circumstances as there can endless reasons behind a single crime.
On the other hand, sometimes it is possible that the same punishment for similar crime will be unfair. Some crimes, most probably the major crimes would happen in completely situation should be treated differently. For example a planned murder and an international accident should have different punishment. Rather than making people insecure these law will give them more freedom.
In my opinion, crime should be fixed for every type of punishment and it is the best way to keep the system. Accountable and simple and in addition the equality among citizens will also be maintained.
Crime is considered by law and rules of constitution. Some people support for fixed punishment for each type of crime while other group of people argue that the circumstances of and individual crime should be taken when the punishment would be decided. I believe that there should be always consideration of circumstances and situation behind. The crime and according to them punishment should be given.
By the fixed punishment, crime would be decreased and society will remain safe. Saudi Arabia is the country which have lowest rate of crime. If anyone is caught in robbery then their hands are cut, wither the person stolen an apple or car. This type of punishment is injustiable for people who are mentally unstable, children and also pregnant women. Therefore at the time of decision, circumstances should be considered.
On the other hand, if fixed punishment for each type of crime then time of case or court healing would be reduced so. Judges have not to think about it, because each crime has same punishment. However in case of murder or they had capital punishment then it would be unfair sometimes. If a person killed someone intentionally then she/he is warty for it but if they are trying to save themselves from opposite and perhaps killed them, then judge should have to notice circumstances.
In conclusion, I believe that there should be always consideration of circumstances because some in fixed punishment, innocent person could be harshly punished which they do not deserve.
Sample Answer: 3
Different people have varied opinion regarding to the punishment for any crime. Advocates ponder that there should be fixed punishment for particular crime. However besides of deciding punishment we should think about the circumstances or some situation which influence person to do particular crime said opponents. Both are mandatory in their own ways.
To begin with, it is essential to have particular punishment on particular crime. Because if very crime have same punishment then people do not afraid of about the punishment. For instance, if person stole any stuff and caught by the police then policemen take penalty and leave him. Again their and policeman do same thing then there is no fear among the arrest. However policeman should take some steps on this action hence person have fear regarding to the crime. Apart from that government should decided punishment according to the crime so it gives justice for example person do some small mistake then he does not deserve death penalty. Hence there are no chances of discrimination.
However, it is also true that government should ponder about the situation or problem which influence person to do crime. For instance, if person do robbery in the bank and catch by the police. Then some steps take on this action and this person is stands on the court. Then judge should ask him why he does this type of crime and what influence him to do this action. After heard this judge should decide the punishment. Nonetheless sometime thief tell lie about their crime if punishment is curtains after hearing of the circumstances and situation.
In conclusion, it is important to have fixed punishment of the crime but sometime judge or jury should hear about the factor which influence them to do. Hence the punishment might be reduced but after the proper investigation of the problem which is true or not.
Sample Answer: 4
In this modern era, every country has different methods for dealing with crime some people support for fixed punishment for each type of violation while other group of people argue that the circumstances of and individual crime should be taken when punishment would be decided. I believe that there should be always consideration of circumstances and situation behind the crime and then after according to them punishment should be given to any culprit.
On the other hand, if there is same punishment for each crime, it is injustiable for people who are mentally unstable, children and also pregnant women as well as who is in their senior citizen aged (above 65). So at that time of decision, circumstances should be considered. For instance, in Saudi Arabia, if any on is caught in burglary and robbery then hands are cut of the lawbreaker irrespective of which item they have stolen. Moreover, this kind of strict punishment for each crime is sometimes injustices with the criminal so that why when decision are making about any punishment that time circumstances should be considered.
On the other hand, if fixed punishment for each type of crime then time of case and court hearing should be reduced so judge have not to think about it much more, because each crime has same punishment. Crime is no different. So, it is possible that two people who commit murder can have two entirely different movies; if a person killed someone intentionally then they had capital punishment for it but sometime if anyone trying to save themselves while the incident happened accidentally. Fixed punishment both of them will receive the same verdict which is unfair. So this unfairness gets motivated to involve themselves with illegal activities. So, that time judges should have to notice circumstances.
To conclusion, I believe that in fixed punishment always be consideration of circumstances because sometime innocent person could be punished, which they do not really deserve it that punishment.